By now, you’ve probably heard of the new, “air-traffic control” system that’s being rolled out to cities across the country.
The “air traffic control” is a system that, while it’s still in its infancy, is already helping to ease some of the problems faced by air traffic controllers during the worst of the hurricanes, snowstorms, and other disasters.
But, as with most things that happen during an apocalypse, the rollout has been plagued by a lack of funding and oversight, as the FAA has only recently been given $25 million in funding for the program.
That hasn’t stopped some cities from putting a few extra air-traport stations into their airspace, though they’ve been met with a lot of skepticism from the public and others who say the airports have not been properly equipped and have been plagued with problems.
In a recent report for the Center for Aviation Safety and Accountability, researchers and industry experts looked at a variety of scenarios to determine whether an air traffic control system could help to alleviate the worst aspects of the disasters.
They concluded that the systems capabilities would likely not work in a way that would allow them to effectively address the needs of the most impacted communities.
In addition, a recent study conducted by the National Center for Atmospheric Research found that the cost of an air-trains systems is not only a significant impediment to implementation, but also a major factor in the decision to put a particular airport in the airspace.
It also found that, as a result of the FAA’s funding, airports are having to do a lot more work than they normally would to ensure the systems are operational.
The study found that for each hour of time it takes to get an airport’s airspace operational, there’s an additional $2,200 in costs to pay for maintenance and operation, according to a CNNMoney report.
And, as an added layer of complication, these costs are not covered by federal transportation dollars.
The authors of the study said that while it is a problem that can be mitigated, it could take a significant amount of time to do so and that the FAA must be given a more immediate response.
If we can get a lot better information and information quickly, then we can be more efficient and we can make the system more efficient,” said Dan Krieger, executive director of the American Airlines Institute, in a CNN interview.
The FAA said that it’s currently working on a system for the air traffic systems to be put into operation in the next two years, but that, for now, the pilot community is not getting a clear picture of what that system will look like.
“I’m not able to give you any details right now.” “
We’re working on that,” FAA spokeswoman Erin Evers told CNNMoney.
“I’m not able to give you any details right now.”
The FAA is working with the FAA to figure out the system and what it will look, and officials are hoping that the pilot pilots will get a better sense of what is required to ensure that it works.